Pilot studies and what they can establish
Read preliminary feasibility results without treating a small pilot as definitive evidence that a peptide intervention works.
Read the article →Explore peptide science, analytical testing and the documentation behind research materials.
Read preliminary feasibility results without treating a small pilot as definitive evidence that a peptide intervention works.
Read the article →Distinguish new-data replication from reanalysis and judge consistency using the question, methods and uncertainty.
Read the article →Read the magnitude, units and direction of a reported effect before judging its biological importance.
Read the article →Interpret a confidence interval as uncertainty in an estimated parameter and distinguish it from the spread of individual measurements.
Read the article →Understand what a power calculation assumes and why a small study’s non-significant result may leave meaningful effects unresolved.
Read the article →Recognise how testing many outcomes changes the interpretation of a selected significant result.
Read the article →Translate a percentage or fold change back to the underlying values and identify the reference used.
Read the article →Identify what a figure divides by or sets as a reference, and understand which information the transformation preserves or hides.
Read the article →Distinguish an unusual observation from a documented error and assess how data-removal decisions affect a result.
Read the article →Assess what unobserved outcomes could change and distinguish missing measurements from observed zero responses.
Read the article →Distinguish a combination’s response from evidence that the effect of one factor depends on another.
Read the article →Trace a paper’s main claim into its methods, figures and limitations before using it in an evidence summary.
Read the article →