The label CJC-1295 can lead readers into the wrong literature if its molecular qualifier is lost. Novum’s “Without DAC” product is named Modified GRF (1–29) in the supplied reports. This guide follows that identity boundary and explains why the frequently cited long-acting CJC-1295 studies do not automatically describe the material behind this catalogue label.
Start with the name used in the actual report
The supplied 5 mg certificate, MA-PEP-0027, names Modified GRF (1–29) and explicitly describes it as a 29-residue amidated peptide marketed as CJC-1295 without DAC. Its identity result is a comparison with a named reference.Supplied Modified GRF (1–29) 5 mg report — MA-PEP-0027, Rev. 01 (opens in a new tab)
The document does not print the full amino-acid sequence. The report name therefore provides a clearer material category than the abbreviated catalogue label, but it does not disclose every structural detail of the reference.
| Field | Entry for the supplied report |
|---|---|
| Catalogue label | CJC-1295 Without DAC |
| Report material name | Modified GRF (1–29) |
| Reported structural description | 29-residue amidated peptide |
Retain all three fields when collecting literature. Replacing them with CJC-1295 alone removes the information most likely to affect whether a paper is relevant.
Understand why the added group matters
Jetté and colleagues’ 2005 original study describes CJC-1295 as a substituted GRF-derived peptide with an added reactive lysine derivative at its C terminus. The research examined albumin bioconjugation and prolonged persistence.Jetté and colleagues — Human growth hormone-releasing factor (hGRF)1-29-albumin bioconjugates: identification of CJC-1295 as a long-lasting GRF analog (opens in a new tab)
This is a structural modification with a purpose in the investigated molecule. Omitting it is not merely changing the packaging, concentration or punctuation in the name.
The FDA’s 2024 technical evaluation also distinguishes CJC-1295-related forms with and without DAC, and separately distinguishes salt forms. Here that source is used for chemical identity distinctions, not as a statement of current UK legal status.FDA — CJC-1295-related substances: December 2024 PCAC briefing document (opens in a new tab)
This separation prevents a misleading comparison in which two materials are treated as equivalent merely because both labels contain the same development code.
Keep the long-acting human study with its own molecule
Teichman and colleagues’ 2006 publication reports placebo-controlled studies of a long-acting CJC-1295 analogue in healthy adults, measuring pharmacokinetics and growth-hormone/IGF-I responses.Teichman and colleagues — Prolonged stimulation of GH and IGF-I secretion by CJC-1295, a long-acting analog of GHRH, in healthy adults (opens in a new tab)
That study is relevant background to the development of albumin-binding CJC-1295. It does not provide a measured human duration of action for the Modified GRF material in the supplied without-DAC report.
A common reading error would copy the long-acting study’s time course into a description of the catalogue product. The correct response to the identity mismatch is to exclude that result as a direct duration estimate, not to adjust it using an assumed conversion.
This guide therefore does not assign a numerical half-life to the without-DAC product. A defensible value would need a matching molecular preparation, an identified study and a clear account of what was measured.
The same restriction applies to hormone-response magnitudes. A shared GRF-derived sequence cannot, by itself, transfer a result across materially different experimental agents.
Sort candidate papers into direct and contextual evidence
| Paper description | How to classify it |
|---|---|
| Complete matching Modified GRF identity | Candidate for direct comparison after checking methods |
| Albumin-binding CJC-1295 | Related development context |
| CJC-1295 with no structural detail accessible | Identity unresolved; do not assume a match |
This approach leaves room for useful background papers without letting them stand in for missing direct evidence. It also makes uncertainty visible to the next reader instead of hiding it in a familiar name.
For this catalogue entry, the most useful reference question is which precise Modified GRF structure was tested. Resolve that before interpreting duration, response magnitude or claims about a combination containing it.
Sources and further detail
- Supplied Modified GRF (1–29) 5 mg report — MA-PEP-0027, Rev. 01 (opens in a new tab)
Supplied PDF re-read for material name, without-DAC description, amidation and reference-based identity result. Full sequence is not printed. Document interpretation, not independent authentication.
- Jetté and colleagues — Human growth hormone-releasing factor (hGRF)1-29-albumin bioconjugates: identification of CJC-1295 as a long-lasting GRF analog (opens in a new tab)
Original 2005 abstract and authors checked for the reactive C-terminal addition and albumin-conjugate research. No synthesis method or numerical duration transferred to Modified GRF.
- FDA — CJC-1295-related substances: December 2024 PCAC briefing document (opens in a new tab)
Official technical identity discussion on PDF pages 7–9 read. Used only to distinguish chemical forms. This historical briefing is not treated as a final regulatory determination or current UK law.
- Teichman and colleagues — Prolonged stimulation of GH and IGF-I secretion by CJC-1295, a long-acting analog of GHRH, in healthy adults (opens in a new tab)
Original 2006 indexed abstract, trial description and metadata checked. Long-acting study retained as contextual evidence, not a study of the supplied without-DAC product.
Sources checked 19 September 2026. Worked examples are illustrative unless a supplied report is explicitly identified. This article has not undergone independent scientific peer review.